![]() | |
| ||||
| I think the concept is great, and I see no reason not to use it. They suggest the following benefits:
In case anybody doesn't know what it does: Sandboxie runs your programs in an isolated space which prevents them from making permanent changes to other programs and data in your computer. ![]() http://www.sandboxie.com/
__________________ __________________ Check us out on Facebook!Useful Guides: Networking 101 Security 101 Disable Real Time Monitoring Virus/Malware Preliminary Removal Instructions |
| ||||
| user Review by: mikesantana Complete browsing safety for FREE, register for some extra features you can live without.user Review by: Geejay The idea behind this application is a very good one but, honestly I found this programuser Review by: MikeyBikey I've been using successive versions of this prog for about 5 months now and I'vePro & Con comments Overfiew of Conflicts
Services A Windows computers includes several service programs which are designed to accept requests from application programs. Many service programs run inside special svchost.exe processes (programs), although some others run as standalone processes. Programs running under Sandboxie are not allowed to reach those system service programs, due to the isolation of the sandbox. Instead, Sandboxie provides its own service programs, which run in the same sandbox as the program requesting the service.
__________________ J. O. Beard; you + tech-101.com => synergism. Secure your system now |
| ||||
| I would have mixed feelings about Sandboxie. For myself, it's a matter of control> mine, not a sandbox. Thinking of the entries I see in the logs I check: A lot of users are going to have to disable (can you do that?) the sandbox to do what they want with their system. Some of this will be the evil file sharing: so questions: 1. Will they disable it to succeed in one feature? 2. Will they then enable it while doing other things. 3. Will they even cqre? There is a story about the broken window- some of you may know it: it' basically that the fix should be not fixing the broken window, but prevent those things which cause the break. That is oversimplified but adequate for this. No security is going to prevent everything. And the habits of users must be changed if protection is going to be effective. As I frequently say, the first line of security is the users themselves. A look at Tracking Cookies can be a good insight to some of the sites users frequent. So I'd have to sum this up a good in theory but questionable in practice.
__________________ wave:Computer Support and Help Virus & Malware Removal Tutorials on "How To...." Stop Nuisance Startups |
| ||||
| Well I have been "playing in the sand" a little. The nice thing is that nothing runs in the sandbox unless you tell it to. In other words you can still run everything normally - or you can right click/ run sandboxed. It seems to work as advertised with browsers which is all I have messed with so far.
__________________ __________________ Check us out on Facebook!Useful Guides: Networking 101 Security 101 Disable Real Time Monitoring Virus/Malware Preliminary Removal Instructions |
| ||||
| Choice is always a good thing, but only if the chooser has some common sense! So- you have to be smart enough to know when to use it which conversely means the users who need it the most- won't!
__________________ wave:Computer Support and Help Virus & Malware Removal Tutorials on "How To...." Stop Nuisance Startups |
![]() |
| Tags |
| reviews |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Copyright © 2009 Tech-101.com. All rights reserved.